Skip to main content
· 8/5/1986

Cantwell v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 347 S.E.2d 523
  • 2 Va. App. 606
  • 3 Va. Law Rep. 166
  • 1986 Va. App. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the record clearly established that the delay was attributable to defendant’s filing, two weeks before trial, of six motions raising eight difficult issues for the trial judge
  • the purpose of the indictment is to provide defendant \notice of the nature and character of the offense charged\
  • Although court’s order was silent as to the reasons for die continuance, the complete record (as defined by Rule 5A:7) was found to be sufifi cient to excuse delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.