Cantwell v. Allegheny County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \the essential provisions of [ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 324A ] have been the law in Pennsylvania for many years\
• explaining that “the essential provisions of [Section 324A] have been the law in Pennsylvania for many years”
• finding that duty requires \foreseeable harm to a foreseeable class of plaintiffs \
• concluding that Section 324(A) correctly states Pennsylvania law
• concluding that Section 324(A) correctly states Pennsylvania law
• applying Section 324A and 21 noting that “the essential provisions of this section have been the law in Pennsylvania for many years”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).