Skip to main content
· 4/11/1988

Cantu v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE

Citations

  • 752 P.2d 390
  • 51 Wash. App. 95
  • 1988 Wash. App. LEXIS 112
  • 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeal have rejected the per se rule in favor of a discretionary standard
  • upholding a trial court’s exercise of discretion to determine whether an EEOC determination should be admitted to support a state law claim
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission determination held inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.