· 4/11/1988
Cantu v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE
Citations
- 752 P.2d 390
- 51 Wash. App. 95
- 1988 Wash. App. LEXIS 112
- 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeal have rejected the per se rule in favor of a discretionary standard
- upholding a trial court’s exercise of discretion to determine whether an EEOC determination should be admitted to support a state law claim
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission determination held inadmissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.