Skip to main content
· 11/2/2015

Cantu v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 417
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3237
  • 193 L. Ed. 2d 317
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 6915
  • 2015 WL 5310041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “That which is necessarily implied in a statute, or must be included in it in order to make the terms actually used have effect, according to their nature and ordinary meaning, is as much a part of it as if it had been declared in express terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.