Cantrell v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Indiana Tort Claims Act does not apply to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims
• holding “in most circumstances the ITCA provides practical immunity to the government officer in his or her individual capacity by providing that the governmental unit is to defend and pay any judgment for actions taken within the scope of employment[.]”
• \[T]he [Indiana Tort Claims Act] does not apply to claims based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983.\
• finding wrongful discharge claim governed by ITCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).