· 5/1/1958
Cantrell v. Haas
Citations
- 161 F. Supp. 433
- 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2385
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff was qualified to represent class although he had omitted nine class period transactions from his certification, information which was ultimately provided in discovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warlick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.