Cantor v. Cantor
Citations
- 70 Pa. Super. 108
- 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 184
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Venereal disease — Cruel and barbarous treatment — Indignities to the person.</p> <p>A husband is not entitled to a divorce from his wife because she has syphilis, if it appears that as soon as she discovered that she had the disease, she withdrew from all relations with him, and that the husband had not contracted the disease from her.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Breene v. BreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-07-14· cited 68×
- Lannamann v. LannamannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-07-17· cited 7×
- Darcy v. DarcySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-01-16· cited 4×
- Bowman v. BowmanSuperior Court of Delaware· 1934-02-23
- Aller v. AllerFayette County Court· 1921-05-31
- Nice v. NiceMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1950-01-30
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McMahen v. McMahenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-07-21· cited 22×
- Schulze v. SchulzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-04-15· cited 22×
- Biddle v. BiddleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-04-15· cited 18×
- Platt v. PlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-02-26· cited 17×
- Baughman v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-10-07· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.