Canto v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the credibility of witnesses [who identified the defendant as the culprit] is not to be re -weighed on appeal\
• holding that \the credibility of witnesses [who identified the defendant as the culprit] is not to be re -weighed on appeal\
• holding that allegations that the victim was not “sufficiently cogent and lucid” to make a pretrial identification go to the weight of the evidence and not the admissibility of the identification
• stating that a Kloiber instruction is not necessary where the witness declines to identify the defendant in court
• stating that a Kloiber instruction is not necessary where the witness declines to identify the defendant in court
• holding allegations the victim was not sufficiently lucid to make a pretrial identification go to the weight of the evidence and not to the admissibility of the identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).