Cantine v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a renunciation instruction for the crime of conspiracy was not warranted when “although the record provide[d] sparse evidence of [appellant’s] involvement in the conspiracy ... there [was] no evidence of an affirmative withdrawal from the conspiracy”
• redacted statement properly admitted where, to the extent original statement was exculpatory, redacted version conveyed same information
• “ex-conspirator may remain liable for the original act of conspiring” even after he has withdrawn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).