Canterbury Liquors & Pantry v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Massachusetts post-and-hold liquor pricing scheme was a per se violation of S 1
• declaring state statute relating to the pricing of wholesale liquor was preempted by the Sherman Act but declining to enter separate injunction to similar effect
• declaring state statute relating to the pricing of wholesale liquor was preempted by the Sherman Act but declining to enter separate injunction to similar effect
• “I am persuaded by the reasoning and statements of the Supreme Court to concur with . . . Judge Winter in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).