Skip to main content
· 1/7/1997

Canteen Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

  • 103 F.3d 1355
  • 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2065
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the NLRB had found that \ `the [new employer] had effectively and clearly communicated to the Union its plan to retain the predecessor employees' \ (emphasis added)
  • \The Court thus established that a successor would be required to bargain with the union before setting its initial terms of hiring when it was clear that it intended to hire a majority of the predecessor's workforce.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Evans, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.