Cantalino v. Danner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dismissal in the interest of justice was a favorable termination for the purposes of a malicious prosecution action where “the court’s reasons for dismissing the criminal charges were not inconsistent with the innocence of the accused”
• holding that a dismissal in the interest of justice was a 10 favorable termination for the purposes of a malicious prosecution action where “the court’s 11 reasons for dismissing the criminal charges were not inconsistent with the innocence of the 12 accused”
• requiring the termination be “not inconsistent” with innocence, rather than consistent with innocence
• “[T]he question is whether, under the circumstances of each case, the disposition was inconsistent with the innocence of the accused.”
• “[T]he question is whether, under the circumstances of each case, the disposition was inconsistent with the innocence of the accused.”
• “[T]he question is whether, under the circumstances of each case, the disposition was inconsistent with the innocence of the accused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).