Skip to main content
· 11/15/1984

Cantaline v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 103 F.R.D. 447
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 552
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[wjhere corporations have a common legal cause or identity of interest in a matter discussed with an attorney, a joint privilege attaches to the discussion”
  • finding a joint representation when a parent’s officer and general counsel affirmatively advised subsidiary on how to comply with merger agreement to which parent and subsidiary were both parties
  • finding a joint representation when a parent’s officer and general counsel affirmatively advised subsidiary on how to comply with merger agreement to which parent and subsidiary were both parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gonzalez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.