· 11/15/1984
Cantaline v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 103 F.R.D. 447
- 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 552
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[wjhere corporations have a common legal cause or identity of interest in a matter discussed with an attorney, a joint privilege attaches to the discussion”
- finding a joint representation when a parent’s officer and general counsel affirmatively advised subsidiary on how to comply with merger agreement to which parent and subsidiary were both parties
- finding a joint representation when a parent’s officer and general counsel affirmatively advised subsidiary on how to comply with merger agreement to which parent and subsidiary were both parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gonzalez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.