Skip to main content
· 3/26/2014

Cansino v. Bank of America

Citations

  • 224 Cal. App. 4th 1462
  • 169 Cal. Rptr. 3d 619
  • 2014 WL 1229660
  • 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting out the elements for affirmative 5 misrepresentation in which a duty to disclose is not required
  • sustaining dismissal without 11 leave to amend in demurrer to second amended complaint
  • “[T]he second amended complaint is deficient for the 22 additional reason that plaintiffs failed to establish the timeliness of the fraud claim.”
  • “[T]he second amended complaint is deficient for the 14 additional reason that plaintiffs failed to establish the timeliness of the fraud claim.”
  • emphasis 27 9 For brevity, the court will not repeat this analysis on each occasion plaintiffs raise the argument 28 1 added
  • “The law is well established that actionable misrepresentations must pertain to past or existing material facts. Statements or predictions regarding future events are deemed to be mere opinions which are not actionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.