Canseco v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]rison administrators must provide an adequate diet without violating an inmate’s religious dietary restrictions in order not to unconstitutionally burden free exercise rights.”
• “[P]rison administrators must provide an adequate diet without violating an inmate’s religious dietary restrictions in order not to unconstitutionally burden free exercise rights.”
• “A prisoner who is consistently not provided meals in accordance with his religious beliefs is substantially burdened in the exercise of his religion.”
• denial of religiously certified halal meals on seven occasions during a prison lockdown was a “mere de minimis intrusion” that failed to substantially burden inmate’s religious beliefs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).