Skip to main content
· 10/20/2005

Canopy Corp. v. Symantec Corp.

Citations

  • 395 F. Supp. 2d 1103
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25842
  • 2005 WL 2678960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the use of the word “defend” in the indemnification provision indicates the parties intent for the provision only to apply to third-party claims
  • holding the use of the word “defend” in the indemnification provision indicates the parties intent for the provision only to apply to third-party claims
  • applying Utah law and holding that the use of the word “defend” in the indemnification provision indicated the parties’ intent that the provision only apply to third-party claims
  • “[Plaintiff’s] claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing is redundant of its breach of contract claim.”
  • “To state a separate claim, [Plaintiff] must demonstrate some implied promise separate from a breach of the Agreement’s term provision that could support this cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kimball

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.