Skip to main content
· 4/29/1986

Cano v. Lovato

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 762
  • 105 N.M. 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that original purchaser who improved property would be entitled to recover the lesser of the value of his labor and materials or the amount his improvements added to the market value of the land
  • agreeing that jurisdictional defects can provide additional grounds for challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarid, Donnelly, Bivins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.