Cano v. Everest Minerals Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting distinction between federal and Texas approaches when federal procedure governed admissibility of expert testimony but Texas state law governed substantive sufficiency of evidence review
• “Havner controls the issue of what evidence is required to establish causation in a toxic tort case and therefore what evidence is relevant.”
• “Havner controls the issue of what evidence is required to establish causation in a toxic tort case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).