Skip to main content
· 2/4/1994

Cannone v. Noey

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 797
  • 1994 Alas. LEXIS 6
  • 1994 WL 30459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there was no per se taking because the parcel could have been sold or it could have been used for a different use
  • where state imposed restrictions on subdivision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.