· 2/4/1994
Cannone v. Noey
Citations
- 867 P.2d 797
- 1994 Alas. LEXIS 6
- 1994 WL 30459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that there was no per se taking because the parcel could have been sold or it could have been used for a different use
- where state imposed restrictions on subdivision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Burke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.