Cannon v. William Chevrolet/Geo, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the court retained jurisdiction to hear the claim for fees, any other judgment entered before decision on that claim “was nonfinal and nonappealable” absent a Rule 304(a) finding
• noting that “the clerk shall prepare and certify the record on appeal” (Emphasis in original.)
• adopting two-part Hensley test where the court “must evaluate whether the claims (1) involved a common core of facts or related legal theories and (2
• “Without the transcript, we are unable to discern the trial court’s reasoning and whether it abused its discretion.”
• “Motions in limine are not designed to obtain rulings on dispositive matters but, rather, are designed to obtain rulings on evidentiary matters outside the presence of the jury.” (Emphasis in original.)
• “Motions in limine are not designed to obtain rulings on dispositive matters but, rather, are designed to obtain rulings on evidentiary matters outside the presence of the jury.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).