Cannon v. Wells Fargo Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence obtained from a car search was admissible because it would have been inevitably discovered during an inventory search
• holding that “co- conspirators’ post-agreement course of conduct is circumstantial evidence of [their] specific intent at the time [the crime was arranged] to provide monetary compensation for the murder’s completion”
• finding that cell phones and an iPad could be seized under the plain view doctrine where prior investigation, including a wiretap, had revealed that the defendant's criminal activity involved the use of cell phones
• explaining that the vehicle exception “justifies the search of every part of the vehicle”
• explaining that the jury need not “divine the precise nature of th[e] consideration”
• finding that cell phones and an iPad could be seized under the 7 plain view doctrine where prior investigation, including a wiretap, had revealed that 8 the defendant’s criminal activity involved the use of cell phones

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).