Supreme Court of Georgia· 10/16/2017
Cannon v. State
Citations
- 302 Ga. 327
- 806 S.E.2d 584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A strategic decision about what jury instruction to request will be deemed deficient performance only if it is patently unreasonable.”
- failure to give requested charge on impeachment by prior conviction of eyewitness harmless error where not highly probable that error contributed to the verdict and trial court properly instructed jury on impeachment in general
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-05-06· cited 47×
- Mangram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-08-02· cited 8×
- Beard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-12-19· cited 6×
- Frankie Solomon Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-21
- Joseph Wayne Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-04-20
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-05· cited 210×
- Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-05-14· cited 124×
- Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-08-14· cited 45×
- Jessie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-01-21· cited 27×
- Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-11-17· cited 24×
- State v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-02· cited 23×
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-10-20· cited 12×
- Reddick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-01· cited 12×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-28· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.