Skip to main content

Cannon v. State

Citations

  • 578 S.W.2d 20
  • 265 Ark. 270
  • 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We have heretofore rejected the idea that common knowledge and | ^experience could serve as a substitute for evidence of value which is a necessary element of a crime [.]”
  • $148 paid for model car 12 years earlier; $100 value required
  • $148 paid for model car 12 years earlier; $100 value required
  • where there was no contention that the evidence did not warrant a finding that appellant was guilty of theft by receiving, any error in the denial of appellant's motion to dismiss could be corrected by modifying the judgment to reduce it to an appropriate sentence for a misdemeanor
  • where there was no contention that the evidence did not warrant a finding that appellant was guilty of theft by receiving, any error in the denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss could be corrected by modifying the judgment to reduce it to an appropriate sentence for a misdemeanor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fogleman, Harris, Holt, Hickman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.