Cannon v. Paulson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Third parties’ privacy interests are not lost because a requester knows or can determine from a redacted record their identities.”
• “[O]ther courts have held that claims of constructive discharge are not sufficiently similar to claims of discrimination under the ‘like or related to’ test to proceed if one of the claims was not raised at the administrative level.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).