Cannon v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court has a “responsibility to follow” decisions issued by our Supreme Court
• holding that this Court has a “responsibility to follow” decisions issued by our Supreme Court
• holding that the Court of Appeals lacks the authority to overrule decisions of the Supreme Court of North Carolina and has a “responsibility to follow those decisions, until otherwise ordered by the Supreme Court”
• holding that the Court of Appeals lacked the authority to overrule decisions of the Supreme Court of North Carolina and has, instead, a “responsibility to follow those decisions, until otherwise ordered by the Supreme Court”
• holding that the Court of Appeals lacked the authority to overrule decisions of the Supreme Court of North Carolina and has, instead, a “responsibility to follow those decisions, until otherwise ordered by the Supreme Court”
• holding the Court of Appeals has a “responsibility to follow” decisions of the Supreme Court, “until otherwise ordered” by our Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).