Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/11/1888

Cannon v. Lomax

Citations

29 S.C. 369
1 L.R.A. 637
7 S.E. 529
1888 S.C. LEXIS 146

Syllabus

<p>An action for partition is premature while two of the tenants in common (defendants) hold an unexpired lease of the entire property, executed to them by a common ancestor.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San Diego
Supreme Court· 1954-01-18· cited 228×
Coyle v. Due
North Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-09-14· cited 3×
City of Spartanburg v. Gossett
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-12-20· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Wilkin v. Wilkin
New York Court of Chancery· 1814-08-29· cited 45×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.