Cannon Builders, Inc. v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the nature of the suit, which includes a claim that Crooks was entitled to enforce the Rice- Cannon contract as a third-party beneficiary, was sufficiently based on a commercial transaction . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).