Canning v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]n the absence of any *** specific references to evidence in the record, [the reviewing court could] only conclude that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying this motion [to amend the pleading]”
• “The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to inform the court of any errors it has made and to provide an opportunity for their correction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).