Skip to main content
· 2/1/2013

Canning, III v. Beneficial Maine, Inc.

Citations

  • 706 F.3d 64
  • 2013 WL 388060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellant waived issue by failing to raise it in its opening brief
  • stating that appellants waived issue by failing to raise it in their opening brief
  • stating that appellants waived issue by failing to raise it in their opening brief
  • stating that appellant waived issue by failing to raise it in its brief
  • affirming the bankruptcy court’s and the B.A.P.’s rulings distinguishing Pratt and failing to find coercion
  • highlighting, for example, the court's concern for a \subterfuge intended to coerce payment of a discharge debt” and \coercive reaffirmation demands”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Ripple, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.