Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 9/30/1991

Cannefax v. Clement

Citations

  • 818 P.2d 546
  • 170 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
  • 1991 Utah LEXIS 131
  • 1991 WL 195802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the vendor holds title for the benefit of the vendee and that, based on equitable conversion, vendor’s real interest is in personalty, not realty
  • stating that the vendor in a land sale contract’s “true interest is in receiving the unpaid amount on the contract”
  • \[A] vendor who breaches a land sale contract in an attempt to retain the property will be subject to either damages or a decree for specific performance.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Cannefax v. Clement

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.