Cann-Hanson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• officer’s observation that driver had bloodshot, watery eyes and exuded an odor of alcohol was sufficient to show probable cause to arrest for DUI
• officer noted defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and watery, and tried unsuccessfully to perform field sobriety tests
• officer’s observations that defendant “had bloodshot, watery eyes 5 and exuded an odor of alcohol” provided sufficient probable cause to arrest
• even absent field sobriety tests, officer’s observations that defendant had bloodshot, watery eyes and smelled of alcohol provided sufficient probable cause to arrest
• officer’s observations that defendant “had bloodshot, watery eyes and exuded an odor of alcohol” provided sufficient probable cause to arrest
• “the results of the field sobriety tests constitute [ ] admissible evidence of probable cause to support [an] arrest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).