Canino v. HRP, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]ssuming that the proffered expert has the requisite minimal education and experience in a relevant field, courts have not barred an expert from testifying merely because he or she lacks a degree or training narrowly matching the point of dispute in the lawsuit.”
• “The Second Circuit has held that ‘quibble’ with [a] proposed expert’s training or knowledge on specific points may be properly explored on cross-examination at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).