Canfield v. Small Business Administration (In Re Tebbs Construction Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts should construe the Code consistent with its commercial purpose
• finding that a filing statement that referenced a security agreement that was not attached, but did reference a previously-filed, lapsed statement to which the relevant security agreement was attached, provided a sufficient collateral description

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).