Skip to main content
· 4/4/1985

Canfield v. Gill

Citations

  • 697 P.2d 476
  • 101 Nev. 170
  • 1985 Nev. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • supreme court will not hesitate to disturb a district court's decision that is not supported by substantial evidence
  • supreme court will not hesitate to disturb a district court’s decision that is not supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.