Canfield v. Bank One, Texas, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “[t]he ninety-day notice period contained in the deposit agreement between Canfield and Bank One is not an unreasonably short period of time”
• noting that a shortened limitations period is valid if “it is reasonable and in conformance with the requisites of contract law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).