Canete v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an inmate's claim for mandamus relief regarding restoration of jail credit was not time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f) when he exhausted all administrative remedies and invoked the trial court's jurisdiction well within one year of that date
• recognizing the discretion of trial courts to award jail credit against each term of consecutive prison sentences on multiple charges
• recognizing the discretion of trial courts to award jail credit against each term of consecutive prison sentences on multiple charges
• expressing serious due process concerns about a sentence imposed outside the defendant’s presence, without notice, and without entry of an appealable sentencing order
• “[A] defendant who is convicted of multiple offenses and sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment must be given presentence jail credit only on the first of the consecutive sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).