· 3/2/1976
Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund
Citations
- 353 A.2d 263
- 277 Md. 120
- 1976 Md. LEXIS 955
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While ... the commission is not to be bound by the usual common law or statutory rules of evidence, such evidence may be subject to rejection in the circuit court on a review de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.