Skip to main content
· 3/2/1976

Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Citations

  • 353 A.2d 263
  • 277 Md. 120
  • 1976 Md. LEXIS 955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While ... the commission is not to be bound by the usual common law or statutory rules of evidence, such evidence may be subject to rejection in the circuit court on a review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.