· 12/28/1953
Candelaria v. Schwartz
Citations
- 122 Cal. App. 2d 309
- 264 P.2d 670
- 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nor is there a need to resort to contra proferen-tum, which, in any event, would be inapplicable to this sophisticated policyholder.”
- contra proferentem was “inapplicable to this sophisticated policyholder”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.