CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL BANK v. PALMER, MATTHEW

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding investigator’s negligent mistakes causing a 23-month post-indictment delay did not weigh heavily against the government
• analyzing a 23-month delay and determining \Mlle Government's negligence\ did not favor the defendant
• “[w]hether the Government violated a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is a mixed question of law and fact”
• “[w]hether the Government violated a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is a mixed question of law and fact”
• “[T]his Court has also determined that, where a defendant asserted his right to a speedy trial but also moved for four continuances prior to that trial, the third Barker factor did not weigh ‘heavily’ against the Government.”
• “A post-indictment delay exceeding one year is generally sufficient to trigger the analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).