Skip to main content
· 12/28/2001

Canal/Norcrest/Columbus Action Committee v. City of Boise

Citations

  • 39 P.3d 606
  • 136 Idaho 666
  • 2001 Ida. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n inquiry into whether further action by [the governing body] is required determines the finality of the approval for appeal purposes.”
  • “An analysis of the finality and appealability of a decision made on a zoning application must necessarily begin with an examination of the relevant zoning ordinances.”
  • “Because a plain reading of the statute contradicts the [party’s] position, and because they do not even claim to have been actually harmed by the [wrongful action], we find that their appeal was brought without a reasonable basis in fact or law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters, Trout, Schroeder, Kidwell, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.