Canales v. Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that homes that were leased for ten and thirty years were not considered abandoned as homestead when there was not enough evidence to conclude what portion had been abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Majeski v. Estate of Majeski
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-04-28· cited 42×
• Tolman v. Overstreet
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-11-15· cited 21×
• Bernard Majeski v. Estate of Sarah Bishop Majeski
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-02-03
• Estate of Domingo Cantu
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-06-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blum v. Rogers
  Texas Supreme Court· 1890-11-18· cited 41×
• Atwood v. Guaranty Const. Co.
  Texas Commission of Appeals· 1933-10-18· cited 13×