Skip to main content
· 6/25/1917

Canal v. Smith

Citations

  • 14 Teiss. 296
  • 1917 La. App. LEXIS 53

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>Where the preponderance of the evidence is for plaintiff and his witnesses are unimpeached, he is entitled to a judgment.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting requirement that absent specific language administrative agency actions be performed \in a reasonable manner\
  • finding courts are required to give due deference to an administrative interpretation by an agency
  • \ 'A court must give due deference to the agency's reasonable interpretation of the legislative scheme.' \
  • “‘A court must give due deference to the agency’s reasonable interpretation of the legislative scheme.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John, Paul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.