Canal Insurance Company v. First General Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the MCS-90 reads excess and other-insurance clauses out of the policy as against injured members of the public.
• recognizing that the MCS-90 reads excess and other-insurance clauses out of the policy as against injured members of the public.
• noting that “policy embodied in the statutes and regulations was to assure that injured members of the public would be able to obtain judgments collectible against negligent authorized carriers.”
• “[T]he policy embodied in the [financial responsibility] statutes and regulations was to assure that injured members of the public would be able to obtain judgments collectible against negligent authorized carriers.”
• defendant’s defense of failure to plead fraud with particularity waived when the defendant stipulated in the pretrial memorandum that the insurance policy at issue was in full force and effect
• “[T]he ICC is empowered to promulgate regulations to insure that motor carriers operating tractors or trailers as lessees under leasing arrangements . . . assume total responsibility for the operation of their rented vehicles, including obtaining adequate insurance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).