Canal Indem. Co. v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court has held \other insurance\ and \limits of liability\ clauses cannot prevent stacking of coverages and \are in derogation of well-settled Alabama law\
• stating that \the insured may stack the coverages provided by other uninsured motorist policies to cover up to the amount of damages required to compensate for the actual injury sustained\
• stating that \[t]he statutory language clearly imposes a `limitation' only on the number of uninsured motorist coverages that can be stacked within one contract of insurance\ and that \the statute does not prevent stacking under two or more separate contracts of insurance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).