District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/13/2002
Canady v. State
Citations
- 813 So. 2d 161
- 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2971
- 2002 WL 384225
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing conviction because defendant was merely a passenger in a vehicle that he knew was stolen
- reversing conviction because defendant was. merely a passenger in a vehicle that he knew was stolen
- “The evidence was insufficient to prove [the defendant’s] criminal intent to deprive another person of property, or to appropriate the property, as required under section 812.014[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fulmer, Northcutt, Silberman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marlene Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-19· cited 125×
- United States v. Cesar Medina-TorresFifth Circuit· 2012-12-21· cited 20×
- Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-01· cited 11×
- A.D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-14· cited 2×
- J. A. H. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-26
- J. K. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-12-04
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.