Skip to main content
· 3/5/2004

Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH

Citations

  • 307 F. Supp. 2d 2
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3526
  • 2004 WL 423973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the Circuit’s “preference for an adjudication on the merits and a corresponding disfavor for resolving litigation by default[]”
  • denying motion to strike answer filed six months late as untimely, where granting motion would “contravene the established policies disfavoring motions to strike . . . and favoring resolution of cases on their merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.