Skip to main content
· 9/1/2009

Canadian Wheat Board v. United States

Citations

  • 637 F. Supp. 2d 1329
  • 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 1204
  • 33 C.I.T. 1204
  • 31 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1955
  • 2009 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a permissive intervenor does not need independent Article III standing
  • noting that a request for administrative review suspends liquidation pending the outcome of the review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eaton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.