Skip to main content
· 1/16/1981

Canadian Pacific Enterprises (U.S.) Inc. v. Krouse

Citations

  • 506 F. Supp. 1192
  • 22 Ohio Op. 3d 188
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that SEC Rule 14d-2(b) preempts Ohio’s waiting period provision and that SEC Rule 14d-2(b) was validly promulgated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kinneary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.