Canadian National Railway Co. v. Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]roof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction”
• “[P]roof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction”
• “[P]roof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction”
• “proof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction”
• “[P]roof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction”
• “[P]roof of a mere possibility of injury is insufficient to justify an injunction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).