Canadian Mining Co. v. Creekmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no testimony showed that child would be harmed absent termination and no \explicit factual finding supporting\ conclusion that child would be harmed
• no testimony showed that child would be harmed absent termination and no “explicit factual finding supporting” conclusion that child would be harmed
• no evidence that children would suffer harm by continuing in foster care
• no evidence that children would suffer harm by continuing in foster care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).